[G Larry]

“greenways and preserves” are NOT the same as the Suburban deterrents described in this article.

I live in a Denver suburb, complete with “greenways and preserves”, which happen to be a great way to provide open trails and enhanced mountain views.

There’s a difference between managing housing density and prohibiting growth.

The simple fact is that you’ve made an unsubstantiated claim, unsupportable by the facts, so you hide your fraud behind insults.

[cripplecreek]

And you aren’t man enough to face reality.

[Darren McCarty]

Greenways and preserves drive up housing costs by reducing supply. It makes one either pay up the nose for a shack or apartment in a city/close-in suburb or force one to live 50 miles out of town past the greenway.

I'm dealing with that outside of Ann Arbor within outer Washtenaw County. While it's personally good for me, it's bad policy. If this goes to its full intentions, I'd have to either live in an Ypsi ghetto, pay big bucks for Ann Arbor, get lucky with a spot in a small town, or go past the county line and pay for it in transportation costs as well as increased housing costs from supply.