Maybe you need to read it again.
What freedom of speech violation occurs when a group of gays decides to boycott a business, and another group decides to make a counter protest by patronising the same business in massive numbers?
Or when several blowhard Democrat mayors attempt to score some cheap political points by spewing empty threats against a business (and then being forced to admit they have no legal grounds to enforce their idiotic harangues?).
Who was denied their First Amendment rights in this case?
That right there is actionable. It's a violation of law. It's not up to the preachers to put down civil insurrection ~ which is exactly what those mayor's promised when they said they'd violate the laws of the land to deny Chic Fil A whatever licenses they needed just because of the beliefs in lawful practices by the owner.
I suggested you people can't understand these matters and you can't!