Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: the scotsman
Pity William is the eldest and the heir after Charles then, isnt it?

From what I can tell, William isn't too bad, but Great Britain needs someone with real grit, and that's Harry.

In the long run, Harry, William, it doesn't matter. Charles will fritter away any slim chance to set things right long before either son gets a chance.

By the way, since I'm sure you are more knowledgeable about the subject than I am, I have a question for you.

Let's just suppose Elizabeth abdicated in favor of Harry. What could a King Harry really do? Does he have any real power to pull GB back from the brink, besides giving a speech or two?

48 posted on 08/04/2012 11:02:55 AM PDT by Leaning Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: Leaning Right

Its Charles—William-—William and Kate’s first child.

Only if (god forbid) William and Kate were to die without issue, would Harry take the throne.


49 posted on 08/04/2012 2:40:13 PM PDT by the scotsman (i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson