You’re from the same ilk as Mountain Mary, but sorry for the mistake.
You have the right to your opinion, but if you’re going to attack the one that will be the only chance to get O out of the WH, I do challenge your reasoning.
Go ahead and vote for Virgil, or write in Sarah.
By the way, Newt, Santorum, Perry, Bachman, Cain, Palin, Limbaugh, and many other conservatives have said they will support Romney. I do have the references for each of these if you would like, but I think you can trust my judgment.
:-) That being said, which one of the above conservatives did you back? Do you still back them?
... and, similarly, you're from "the same ilk" as the pro-gay, pro-abortion, anti-gun Big Gub'mint liberal from Massachusetts. See how that works, winky...?
Newt, Santorum, Perry, Bachman, Cain, Palin, Limbaugh, and many other conservatives have said they will support Romney.
Argumentum ad populum is the error of schoolboys. Extraordinarily slow schoolboys, in particular. No Sale.
That being said, which one of the above conservatives did you back? Do you still back them?
Search function works just as readily for you as it does for me. If you're that genuinely interested: do your own homework.
*PLONK*.
Do tell. Enthrall us.
Bye Bye Noob.
I guess you can find your "ilk" elsewhere.
I know I will. I can't vote for a cowardly fag with no moral character. So tweedle mitt and tweedle obie are out of the question.
The libs and the log cabin types can have mitt all to themselves.
You know, maybe us conservatives will vote for Romney to stop Obama, but there’s no way in hell that we have to like it. We aren’t your GOP vote-slaves, and it’s an insult you to act like we should just smile, shut up, and be happy that a homo-loving, abortion-pushing Massachusetts liberal has been shoved down our throats.
-- the entire homosexual agenda
-- state-run health care (Romney was the real author of ObamaCare)
-- the global warming agenda, even to the point of saying publicly that "we need a worldwide solution, not an American one," in terms of a carbon plan (listen to his CPAC speech of '08)
-- tax-funded on-demand abortion
-- the appointment of activist liberal judges
Romney's record CONFIRMS that he has done all these things. ROMNEY is the guy who belongs at DU.
Rush, Palin, Levin, and all the other pundits don't and never have instructed my opinion; the only reason they have ever had my ear is because the have CONFIRMED my opinion. You can let them tell you how to vote if you want; I'll vote the way my common sense tells me to vote, and my common sense says: the LAST time a president -- and he was a bad one -- was elected on a plurality, he was impeached; the time before that a president -- and he was a bad one --was elected on a plurality, he was held in check and even made to move right by the Republican Revolution.
No matter who wins this time around, Obama or Romney, we're going to have a very bad president. I'M VOTING FOR A PLURALITY. I'm voting third party.
And you can take your "DU" crap, sit on it, and rotate. Tend to the beam in your own eye, of voting for a stone-cold liberal, before you point to the splinters in our eyes, of voting such to risk an Obama re-election.