One’s national. One’s a state policy.
***The national policy is based upon the state policy. Apparently you are more ignorant than you realize.
And Romney has said it will be his first priority. Not that I believe him.
***If you do not believe him, why are you trying to convince conservatives to part with their conservative principles to vote for this lying POS?
—***The national policy is based upon the state policy. Apparently you are more ignorant than you realize.—
I’m thinking you are just trying to get a rise out of me with the “ignorant” remarks. ;-)
Yes. I know the history of Romney Care.
***If you do not believe him, why are you trying to convince conservatives to part with their conservative principles to vote for this lying POS?
I believe I was tho one that posited the idea that an Obama second term shackled to a republican congess may be the best option. The only downside, really, is Obamacare would not be repealed.
You call Romney a POS. However, we are all flawed. When voting for someone for president, you are looking for the person who is “leased flawed” for the job. The one thing we have to fall back on regarding Romney is that he has publicly said that his first priority will be to revoke Obamacare.
Which would you prefer, the one who publicly WANTS obamacare, or the one who, publicly, has said getting rid of it is his first priority?