Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Talisker

I’ve read it. And I’ve read the dissenting opinion.

The dissenting opinion has the right of it. The Court has no Constitutional authority to rule as it did. None at all. The Constitution grants the Court the power to interpret the law, not the power to rewrite it. The power to amend the law is granted solely to Congres—and so is denied anyone and everyone else.

The Roberts opinion is Constitutionally null and void, because it exercises a power not granted to the Court.


25 posted on 08/03/2012 3:17:45 PM PDT by sourcery (If true=false, then there would be no constraints on what is possible. Hence, the world exists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: sourcery
The dissenting opinion has the right of it. The Court has no Constitutional authority to rule as it did. None at all. The Constitution grants the Court the power to interpret the law, not the power to rewrite it. The power to amend the law is granted solely to Congress—and so is denied anyone and everyone else.

Amen! Amen! and AMEN!!!

What Roberts court did is, in my humble opinion, an impeachable offense and if I were a member of congress that action would be underway!

48 posted on 08/04/2012 6:48:01 AM PDT by Bigun ("The most fearsome words in the English language are I'm from the government and I'm here to help!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson