Don't tell me what I've conceded.
Those were not examples of the free expression of religion, which was the subject at hand. Nobody made a claim that they were state establishments of religion.
The inability to make logical distinctions might be the fundamental problem with a lot of people.
People have been intimidated by the most popular religion in America, "Cultural Marxism", better known as "Political Correctness". Progressives don't care about the constitution except as something to break, they don't care about traditional values, logical morality, enlightened self interest, or even the ethic of reciprocity. They want power, and in order to get it they have to break the constitution, they have to break the fundamental building block of our society, and they need to replace the moral code with their own. They have already co-opted our federal government at least with this administration. We are in a war to save our country from those that absolutely need to control or destroy it in order to further their ends.
That is why Christianity is always target along with the constitution, morals, and traditional values. They use divisive arguments to turn Republicans against each other. They lie, they cheat, they steal, they murder. They do everything they need to do in order to further their aims while we argue about mangers and the the 10 commandments.
But perhaps you have some train of logic that I'm not considering. Explain if you will.