Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Extraordinary letter from Hitler's nephew begging to enlist in U.S. Army for fight AGAINST Nazis
Daily Mail ^ | 8-1-12 | Louise Boyle

Posted on 08/01/2012 8:29:58 PM PDT by Dysart

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: tired&retired
with Obama being the current day Chamberlain

I beg to differ. Chamberlain was an honorable, if incompetent, man. Obama is a, fortunately incompetent, traitor.

21 posted on 08/02/2012 1:22:49 AM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: cynwoody

Actually, Chamberlain did much to prepare Britain for war. Contrary to popular belief, he knew war was coming and geared up British industry to prepare itself for war production and also pushed a bill through allowing peacetime conscription for the first time in British history (in the face of strong opposition). He knew Britain wasn’t ready for war in 1938, and he delayed it until September 1939, when Britain STILL wasn’t ready, but probably more ready than it had been...


22 posted on 08/02/2012 2:12:49 AM PDT by sinsofsolarempirefan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: cynwoody

Point well taken and agreed.


23 posted on 08/02/2012 2:16:46 AM PDT by tired&retired
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: sinsofsolarempirefan

“Actually, Chamberlain did much to prepare Britain for war. Contrary to popular belief, he knew war was coming and geared up British industry to prepare itself for war production and also pushed a bill through allowing peacetime conscription for the first time in British history (in the face of strong opposition). He knew Britain wasn’t ready for war in 1938, and he delayed it until September 1939, when Britain STILL wasn’t ready, but probably more ready than it had been...”

Very true. It’s interesting to note how much more capable the UK was in 1939 than the US was.

In 1939 when WW2 started, the total US army was 200,000 strong, the British army had 428,000. The US figure was still 200,000 on July 1st 1940, but by July 1st 1941 it had jumped to 1.31m.

When the war began the US Army Air Corps had 22,000 personnel, 22 serviceable heavy bombers, 700 very obelete light/medium bombers and 500 very obselete fighters. By comparison the RAF had 175,000 personnel, 135 squadrons (74 Bomber, 27 Fighter, 12 Army co-operation, 17 Reconnaissance, 4 Torpedo-bomber and 1 Communications). In addition to this, the Auxiliary Air Force comprised 19 squadrons (3 Bomber, 11 Fighter, 2 Army co-operation and 3 Reconnaissance). By December 1941 the US has 288 heavy bombers, 1100 light/medium bombers (plus 400 obselete) and 1600 fighters plus 500 obselete.

So there was absolutely no chance of the US joining the war when it began in 1939 because they had nothing to fight with but they used the delay between the war starting and them joining in the same way Chamberlain did with his bit of paper - they bought time and built weapons.


24 posted on 08/02/2012 3:49:16 AM PDT by Caulkhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Dysart

The famous, though likely apocryphal, story is that when he showed up at the Navy recruiting station in Times Square, the Chief asked him his name, and when he replied “Hitler”, the recruiter replied, “Glad to meet ya, mine name’s Hess.”


25 posted on 08/02/2012 3:52:20 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (The Democratic Party strongly supports full civil rights for necro-Americans!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dysart
Fascinating history.

"Dear uncle Hitler, YOU SUCK!..."

Pity how he took over and runs the democrat party.

26 posted on 08/02/2012 4:52:57 AM PDT by Caipirabob (I say we take off and Newt the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Caulkhead; sinsofsolarempirefan
“Actually, Chamberlain did much to prepare Britain for war. Contrary to popular belief, he knew war was coming and geared up British industry

Thank you both for that info. I absolutely hate it when something I "believe" turns out to be wrong. Whats worse is that it is because of lazyness, it is an ignorance that could be easily fixed on my part.

I've learned more about history on FR than I did through decades of schooling.

27 posted on 08/02/2012 5:26:02 AM PDT by Paradox (I want Obama defeated. Period.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Paradox

My pleasure. Unfortunately Chamberlain did what was necessary but it looked like appeasement and his reputation has paid the price since and of course he was always going to come off second to Churchill’s charisma.


28 posted on 08/02/2012 6:50:02 AM PDT by Caulkhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Paradox

People also forget that Chamberlain had to contend with public opinion (which was very pro-appeasement) and also to opposition to war from the Dominions. The Canadian Prime Minister, Mackenzie King, told Chamberlain on several occasions during the 1930s that if he ever declared war on Hitler, Canada would remain neutral. He only made it clear to Chamberlain that he would support Britain in a war against Germany in August 1939 when he started to mobilise the Canadian military in preparation for a conflict.
Chamberlain gets a very bum rap as the poster child for appeasement when the fact of the matter is he didn’t really have any choice due to Britain’s military weakness (which he was doing his best to correct) public opinion and the opposition within the Empire.
He did nevertheless, do his best to prepare for the war that became increasingly inevitable, and was the man who in the end was the first world leader to finally stand up to Hitler and declare war on him on September 3rd 1939, later followed by the rest of the Empire and France.


29 posted on 08/02/2012 10:35:43 AM PDT by sinsofsolarempirefan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets
There was a story of a man in the US Army in WWII who had the name Hitler. When he was told he ought to change his name, his reply was, "Let the other guy change his name!"

It's probably apocryphal.

30 posted on 08/02/2012 8:33:58 PM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus

Hitler’s patronymic grandfather was named Johann Georg Hiedler (whether or not he was Alois Hitler’s biological father). Hitler’s father, wrote his name as Alois Hitler. Since Hiedler is a fairly common German family name, his father did a lot of people a favor.


31 posted on 08/03/2012 3:26:48 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (The Democratic Party strongly supports full civil rights for necro-Americans!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson