Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: stuartcr
Then I guess it's already ended. Why 1973?

Between 1967 and 1973, all states instituted unilateral divorce without damages (basically annulling all existing marriage contracts). There is no other form of contract that is construed to be terminable at will by one party with no recourse to the other party.

In 1973, the Supreme Court ruled (in the same term that gave us Roe v. Wade) that marriage did not impose any obligations on a man not also borne by single men with regard to fatherhood, thus rendering a man's marriage promise to support all children born to his wife during their marriage and not otherwise nugatory.

Laws against adultery were already in decline by the 1960s, and by 1973 there was essentially no enforcement anywhere in the United States.

Thus, the legal pillars of "traditional marriage" (permanence, fidelity, unique obligations to children) were all destroyed by 1973.

Since 1973, heterosexuals have enjoyed a novel and unique form of "marriage", which confers certain tax and property benefits but is not otherwise like traditional marriage in any respect.

No wonder homosexuals want in on it.

32 posted on 08/01/2012 2:41:14 PM PDT by Jim Noble (Diseases desperate grown are by desperate appliance relieved or not at all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: Jim Noble

Well put.


33 posted on 08/01/2012 2:45:38 PM PDT by ex-snook (without forgiveness there is no Christianity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Noble

ok


34 posted on 08/01/2012 4:01:15 PM PDT by stuartcr ("When silence speaks, it speaks only to those that have already decided what they want to hear.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson