Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kansas58; Red Steel

That is the most dis-ingenuous argument I have ever heard on this subject and I go back to ‘08 on this. No where in the 14th does it state who is NOT a Citizen. Last time I looked, law is positive.


225 posted on 08/01/2012 1:55:40 PM PDT by GregNH (If you are unable to fight, please find a good place to hide.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies ]


To: GregNH
That is the most dis-ingenuous argument [Kansas58] I have ever heard on this subject and I go back to ‘08 on this. No where in the 14th does it state who is NOT a Citizen. Last time I looked, law is positive.

Many people like putting their heads in the sand because the truth doesn't give them what they want - e.g. AfterBirthers.

229 posted on 08/01/2012 2:07:43 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies ]

To: GregNH
You use lots of strong words but your case is weak.

To say that someone born on US soil of two US Citizen parents is a Citizen does not, in any way, exclude someone who was born overseas of two parents who are citizens, for example.

Likewise, to say someone born on US Soil to two citizen parents is a citizen does not, in any way, say that someone born on US soil to two non-citizen parents is NOT a Natural Born Citizen, in any way shape or form.

I suggest geometry. Draw some circles. Learn grouping and subsets.

Your brain can not handle the subjects, when we try to teach you verbally or in writing.

233 posted on 08/01/2012 2:14:14 PM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson