Am I the only citizen outraged by the ever increasing Democrat politicians (up to the President of the United States) who have decided that they have the power to enforce only the laws that they agree with and disregard the rest?
I’ve heard carbon monoxide poisoning is painless. So should be a bullet to the back of the head. In either case anesthetize the killer first if you’re going to get weepy over the thought of the killer being traumatized.
“The judge was fearful lest the state’s three-drug lethal injection protocol would cause Morales undue pain.”
One wonders if this judge would have feared the undue pain that an unborn infant would suffer by the forcible and violent insertion of an instrument into its brain during an abortion procedure.
Just asking.
There is no problem with a lethal supply of drugs in California. The place is afloat with Heroin.
Leave the occupants of death row a needle and some heroin in their cells for a week —then slip them a hot shot, and they will kill themselves with it.
Problem solved.
They should simply go to an overdose of heroin. People take that drug voluntarily and go back for more, even to the point that they die. That is proof that death by heroin is not cruel.
A death penalty debate in California is not really serious.
There have been 13 executions in the last 34 years.
There have been no executions in the last six and one half years.
Since new death penalty rules were installed in 1978, less than 2% of death row inmates have been executed.
The infamous Scott Peterson is probably the only guy on Death Row who has something to worry about since his execution would be politically popular.
In all fairness, the people of blue state California probably don’t want the death penalty either, even if 61% think they do. Thus they should just eliminate it from their statutes and save a lot of time and effort.
It’s a polling problem, because if you just ask them if they want the death penalty, they say “yes”. But if you go into any detail, about who, why, or how, they will say “no”.
Instead, the pollsters should ask them about specific means of executions: hanging, electrocution, the gas chamber, or lethal injection (3 drugs or just 1 drug is the current debate). This is one area where Californians probably come up short.
If you ask people in Texas, Virginia or Oklahoma, they might even vie for hanging, if associated with promptness instead of the multi-year appeals delays that exist today.
typical liberals. they want to euthanize (kill) old people when they get sick, useless eaters as hitler described them. they cost too much in health care costs, so they cannot contribute to society.
yet they will rally against the death penalty and pay 50,000 plus a year to support the dregs of society.
hangings were legal at the time of the founding fathers, and was efficient, cheap and better yet, public. deterrent for would be killers and thieves.
tired of courts not bothering to consult history, which is an easy way to determine what the constitution actually means.
hang them publicly, or shoot them in a firing squad. people won’t even have to pay for the rope or bullets. there is plenty of people that would contribute to the cause, ‘specially those that have suffered loss due to these thugs.
blessings, bobo