So what I am saying it is better for the country to pay the additional cost to for domestic production, which is really pennies on the dollar, to save US jobs.
You and rudeboy will not acknowledge there is a social and economic cost to outsourcing. There is huge personal cost if its your job outsourced. IMO the social/economic costs are greater than the few pennies per dollar playing footsies with the ChiComs.
I came across three articles today that you might find interesting:
http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2012/07/29/escape-from-economics/
http://www.counterpunch.org/2007/02/19/economists-in-denial/
http://www.counterpunch.org/2006/10/01/the-new-face-of-class-war/
Now I’s off to read another one that just caught my eye;
http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2012/07/30/nationalize-money-not-banks-herman-daly/
In your opinion? Any data a little harder than that?
It can't because the cost of labor for each manufactured item only is only 10% (in average in the USA) of the retail price
Is that your opinion again?
You and rudeboy will not acknowledge there is a social and economic cost to outsourcing.
Yes, there is a cost to US unemployment. Just as there is a cost when the government imposes a tariff to protect a domestic producer. Look at the idiocy of our sugar quotas to see how that works.
There is huge personal cost if its your job outsourced.
Or when your job is eliminated because the government raised the price of the steel that's used to manufacture your product.