To: sinsofsolarempirefan
If those things crash and catch on fire, I bet they will burn hotter than the surface of the sun.
IIRC, I read somewhere a long time ago where the early M-113 APC's had aluminium as armor so when they got hit during the Vietnam War, they burned at a higher temperature and causes a lot more casualties. If they want to make a rustless car, why not stainless steel?
48 posted on
07/27/2012 3:32:04 PM PDT by
Nowhere Man
(June 28th, 2012, the Day America Jumped The Shark.)
To: Nowhere Man
Right down to the Tracks. When you look at Soldiers riding in Viet Nam, they are riding on top of the track. The damned things were mine traps and fire traps. An RPG would eat through the side armor like it wasn’t there.
To: Nowhere Man
Stainless steel tends to work harden as it moves and crack when you try to use it on car bodies.
There was a company that built aftermarket Jeep CJ bodies out of stainless back in the ‘70’s and they always cracked around the frame /body attachment bolt holes. They were beautiful bit every one I ever saw cracked given some use.
82 posted on
07/27/2012 5:03:42 PM PDT by
Clay Moore
(The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of a fool to the left. Ecclesiastes 10:2)
To: Nowhere Man
If they want to make a rustless car, why not stainless steel?
Weight and cost. This isn’t about rust prevention, it’s about weight reduction to meet fuel economy
106 posted on
07/27/2012 6:25:02 PM PDT by
Figment
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson