To: LibFreeUSA
Many anti-discrimination statutes include language similar to, " does not discriminate against or deny services to anyone on the basis of race, color,
creed, . ."
I'm curious if Chick-a-fil's pro-marriage view would fall under 'creed'.
10 posted on
07/27/2012 12:11:42 PM PDT by
aimhigh
To: aimhigh
Many anti-discrimination statutes include language similar to, " does not discriminate against or deny services to anyone on the basis of race, color, creed, . ." Liberal elites don't mind discrimination when it's against the people THEY don't like... like traditional American Christians. They're the haters.
You're right - if rights mattered more than PC 'in' stuff - creed would be covered... and they should not discriminate against us based on our beliefs.
20 posted on
07/27/2012 2:03:52 PM PDT by
GOPJ
(Political correctness is simply George Orwell's Newspeak by a non-threatening name. FR- Bernard Marx)
To: aimhigh
Having a pro-marriage “view” is a 1st Amendment right. Turning someone away at the Chick-Fill-A counter and not letting them ‘Eat-More-Chicken’ because they prefer to sleep with the opposite sex OR express that point of view, is an act of “discrimination”.
To: aimhigh
Having a pro-marriage view is a 1st Amendment right. Turning someone away at the Chick-Fill-A counter and not letting them Eat-More-Chicken because they prefer to sleep with the opposite 'same' sex OR express that point of view, is an act of discrimination.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson