[Durus]

How many people have been disciplined there for wearing strong perfume? How many for smelling of their pets? How many for just smelling bad in general? If it's true that working there required individuals to be "smell neutral" they must have a track record of prior disciplinary actions, and you of course must know of these to be so sure in your assertions. I await your evidence of direct knowledge.

Further, again you might have some source of direct knowledge, according to the information given there isn't a policy on the way people smell, just a "no smoking on company property" policy. If there were a smell policy that included strong perfume, smoking, pets, and whatever else it would be a very different case don't you think? If smells were in fact such an important issue for the health of the patients and the work environment was that sensitive, why don't they have a written policy concerning smells?

Of course you could just be one of those folks that think that grade school insults are a replacement for logical discourse. If that is the case don't bother to respond. If I wanted a insult laden discussion free from logic and reason I would talk to a liberal.

[MrEdd]

http://cancer.about.com/od/chemotherapy/a/managenausea.htm

http://www.cureourchildren.org/nausea.htm

Keeping cancer patients from vomiting is not a political issue.
Yes, every one producing strong odors there would be fired. No exceptions.

If I wanted to bother, I could have pasted thirty or forty links on nausea in cancer patients. I should not have to. Instead, you should learn how to use a search engine.