[Gay State Conservative]

but using whose definition of "bad odor"?

Non smokers,who represent about 85% of the population today,pretty much universally see that odor as very unpleasant.

[Durus]

I'm a nonsmoker and I don't find the smell unpleasant. 98.3% of people are heterosexual and find the idea of homosexuality repellent but companies that fire people for being homosexual are typically sued within an inch of bankruptcy. The health risks associated with being a practicing homosexual are probably higher than that of a heterosexual smoker...can a company have a no-homosexual policy to decrease their insurance rates? While we are on the topic of unhealthy lifestyles can companies also start firing fat people? How about women? They generally use health insurance more than men. Maybe companies can start DNA screening for genetic markers that indicate a predisposition to certain diseases and not hire those people as well. Companies could stop hiring people with bad eye sight, balding people are obviously out as that is unsightly. They would need to start getting rid of workers past 50 as that is when the insurance bills really start to add up. But then young people are more prone to be engaged in risky activity so they might want to consider only hiring those above the age of 30. Then of course they need to aggressively weed out those who seem unhealthy...sunken eyes, being too skinny...for that matter just being ugly indicates some genetic flaws, so get rid of ugly people too.

When everyone is unemployed in this new utopia...who is going to pay for unemployment and welfare?