Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Daffynition

Reading the article, the company is being a bit of a douche about it considering the lengths she went to accomodate them (which tells me there might be other reasons they wanted to get rid of her). Still, if she knew all this up front, and it seems their policy is very up front, she should have known where things stood. I don’t see a lack of disclosure issue here to where it looks like she got bait-and-switched.


11 posted on 07/27/2012 4:38:28 AM PDT by Free Vulcan (Election 2012 - America stands or falls. No more excuses. Get involved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Free Vulcan
The policy up front was no smoking on the premises. They defacto made it a no smoking on or off work premises which is against the law in that state. Their excuse was that she "stank" of smoke.

I haven't had a cigarette in a long time and I still miss it. I even love the smell of cigarette smoke. I've decided that in 35 years I'm going to start smoking again. It will be too late in my life to worry about the cumulative long term health risk associated with smoking, assuming of course I don't get killed by raging neocommunists democrats before then.

15 posted on 07/27/2012 5:02:28 AM PDT by Durus (You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality. Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson