To: cynwoody; Jonty30
If the theatre is preventing people from protecting themselves, then it is the obligation of the theatre to assume the responsibility of protecting its patrons.
I like your logic.
Me too. Asking your statement as a question If the theater is preventing people from protecting themselves, then IS IT the obligation of the theater to assume the responsibility of protecting its patrons? If the answer to that question is found in the court of law to be Yes, that may be what takes down all the "No weapons in here" signs.
That could be the deal breaker right there.
45 posted on
07/25/2012 11:50:17 PM PDT by
sjm_888
To: sjm_888
I believe that the courts have ruled that it is your obligation to ensure the guests well being when they are in your house, e.g. drinking.
A private business would be as responsible for the customers within their premises.
47 posted on
07/25/2012 11:55:33 PM PDT by
Jonty30
(What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson