Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins

“The logic is solid.”

You have no logic, that’s what’s solid.

“If you run someone you know will be rejected by a large share of your supporters, then it is reasonable to assume you don’t want to win.”

You assume way to much with that statement. You assume that a large number of Republicans are going to vote against Romney. So far all I see are a small number of people who are determined to vote third party and by extension, a vote for Obama. It’s a fringe element that thinks itself more than it is...enough people with, with sufficient intelligence, are voting against Obama, but hey, we’re only doing it for the good of the country.

“So, MC, are you a member of the GOP-E?”

Oh of course I am. I just got back from a recent meeting of the Illuminati and Build-A-Burger (different group dedicated to taking over hamburgers). By your logic I would have to be huh? You like stupid assumptions don’t you? You’re like the single issue voter...if I’m not for you, I’m against you huh? I thought by your posts you were narrow minded but didn’t realize your post-it-notes were as thin as a blade of grass.


307 posted on 07/26/2012 8:44:49 PM PDT by MissouriConservative (Voting Anyone but Obama in 2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 279 | View Replies ]


To: MissouriConservative
"So far all I see are a small number of people who are determined to vote third party and by extension, a vote for Obama."

I find it curious how some posters on FR with "Conservative" in their handle do their damndest to pimp the candidacy of the biggest Socialist the GOP has ever put up for President. You ain't foolin' anybody.

315 posted on 07/27/2012 1:32:01 AM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (If you like lying Socialist dirtbags, you'll love Slick Willard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 307 | View Replies ]

To: MissouriConservative; P-Marlowe; cripplecreek; cva66snipe; Elvina; Finny; greyfoxx39; Hilda; ...
“If you run someone you know will be rejected by a large share of your supporters, then it is reasonable to assume you don’t want to win.”

Again, MC, the above is entirely rational. You even know it is. And, I'll bet you'll tell me that you did NOT support Romney. You'll tell me that you don't support his anti-life, pro-gay agenda, anti-gun, pro-cronyist, liberal positions.

Those turn off conservatives. They deflate them. They demoralize them. They discourage them.

They certainly don't fire them up so they get out there and work for the liberal who mouths liberal policies.

So, my conclusion is that you want Obama to win. By knowingly supporting a liberal candidate, by knowingly pushing a guy who is worse than McCain redux, you are pushing for a Republican loss.

The only conclusion is that you are in favor of an Obama victory.

317 posted on 07/27/2012 3:50:14 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 307 | View Replies ]

To: MissouriConservative

Don’t you Romney(bots) ever get tired of saying if you don’t vote for Romney you are voting for BHO? It is bogus.
A non vote for Romney is a non vote for Romney, it is not an additional vote for BHO or whoever.
A non vote for BHO is a non vote for BHO, it is not an additional vote for Romney or whoever.
A non vote for whoever is a non vote for whoever, it is not additional vote for Romney or BHO.


322 posted on 07/27/2012 6:10:39 AM PDT by svcw (If one living cell on another planet is life, why isn't it life in the womb?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 307 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson