Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jwb0581

Be assured, ABC was taping the call to the mother. Guaranteed and if she said what they reported, we would be hearing it 24/7.


10 posted on 07/25/2012 2:17:13 PM PDT by Toespi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Toespi

ABC wouldn’t be able to tape it without her consent. I doubt they did. They have said the producer took detailed notes. I don’t always believe ABC, but in this case I’m not so sure. Consider two mothers:

Mother A: I didn’t say that.
ABC: Yes you did.
Mother A: Prove it.

Mother B’s attorney: (Hey, ABC, is there a tape?)
ABC: (No)
Mother B: I didn’t say that.
ABC: Yes you did.
Mother B: Prove it.

Which mother is more believable? Which one sounds like she is trying to recover from saying something stupid to a reporter?


16 posted on 07/25/2012 2:29:26 PM PDT by RightFighter (It was all for nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Toespi
Be assured, ABC was taping the call to the mother.

If they were, and didn't tell the woman so she could consent, they would be open to criminal prosecution and civil action under California law. California is a "two-party consent" state with regard to recorded conversations.

43 posted on 07/26/2012 8:54:28 AM PDT by Colonel_Flagg (Conservatism is not a matter of convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson