Posted on 07/25/2012 7:37:51 AM PDT by rhema
Author Richard Louv believes that Americas children are now suffering from a syndrome he identifies as nature-deficit disorder. In his recent book, Last Child in the Woods, Louv suggests that the current generation of American children knows the Discovery Channel better than their own backyardsand that this loss of contact with nature leads to impoverished lives and stunted imagination.
Louv begins by recounting an anecdote involving his son, Matthew. When the boy was about ten years of age, he asked his father: Dad, how come it was more fun when you were a kid? The boy was honestly reflecting on his knowledge of his fathers boyhood. Richard Louv, like most of us who came of age in his generation, spent most of our playing time outdoors, building forts in the woods, exploring every nook and cranny of our yards, and participating in activities that centered in child-organized outdoor fun. Louv reflects, Americans around my age, baby boomers or older, enjoyed a kind of free, natural play that seems, in the era of kid pagers, instant messaging, and Nintendo, like a quaint artifact.
Louv argues that this represents nothing less than a sudden shift in the way Americans live, raise their children, and engage the natural world. Within the space of a few decades, the way children understand and experience nature has changed radically. The polarity of the relationship has reversed. Today, kids are aware of the global threats to the environmentbut their physical contact, their intimacy with nature, is fading. Thats exactly the opposite of how it was when I was a child.
Looking back, Louv remembers holding to a rather simplistic view of his environment. As a boy, I was unaware that my woods were ecologically connected with any other forest. No one in the 1950s talked about acid rain or holes in the ozone layer or global warming. But I knew my woods and my field; I knew every bend in the creek and dip in the beaten dirt path. I wandered those woods even in my dreams.
The situation is far different now. As Louv reflects, A kid today can likely tell you about the Amazon rainforestbut not about the last time he or she explored the woods in solitude, or lay in a field listening to the wind and watching the clouds move. In this book, Richard Louv is articulating what many of us have been thinking. I recognize that my own boyhood is far removed from that of my son. It seems as if the world has been drastically changed. I grew up in neighborhoods that were typically suburban. Nevertheless, the woods were always nearby. For me, the woods included untamed tracts of land that were awaiting future suburban development. Nevertheless, this land was filled with trees, swamps, creeks, snakes, crawdads, and all the creeping and crawling things that used to call boys out into the woods.
Louv understands that this transformation of the way we encounter nature extends even to activities that are supposedly focused on nature itself. Not that long ago, summer camp was a place where you camped, hiked in the woods, learned about plants and animals, or told firelight stories about ghosts or mountain lions, Louv recalls. As likely as not today, summer camp is a weight-loss camp, or a computer camp. For a new generation, nature is more abstraction than reality. Increasingly, nature is something to watch, to consume, to wearto ignore.
In reality, many children have almost no contact with nature. They play indoors, focusing on electronic screens that produce an artificial experience. They are surrounded by creature comforts and watched over by anxious parents who are afraid that violent criminals are lurking behind every green tree. Our society is teaching young people to avoid direct experience in nature, Louv observes. That lesson is delivered in schools, families, even organizations devoted to the outdoors, and codified into the legal and regulatory structures of many of our communities.
The larger cultural context is part of the problem. Louv notes that the academic world now seems far more interested in theoretical disciplines than in subjects like natural history and zoology. Beyond this, the biotechnology revolution threatens to blur the lines between humans and other animalsand the line between humans and machines.
Is contact with nature necessary for healthy childhood? Louv is absolutely confident that children have a deep need for contact with the natural world and its wonders. Unlike television, nature does not steal time; it amplifies it, Louv insists. In his view, whatever shape nature takes, it offers each child an older, larger world separate from parents. The natural world offers children an opportunity to think, dream, touch, and play out fantasies about how he or she imagines the world. Nature brings a capacity for wonder and a connection with something real that is endlessly fascinating and largely outside human control.
Louv tells of interviewing thousands of children in the course of previous research. At one point, he received this candid comment from a fourth-grade boy in San Diego: I like to play indoors better, cause thats where all the electrical outlets are.
In the experience of all too many children, the electrical outlets are the determining reality. We have allowed our children to be so seduced by entertainment and information technologies that many believe that without electricity, experience is virtually impossible.
As one mom noted, children now spend much of their time watching. Weve become a more sedentary society, she observes. When I was a kid growing up in Detroit, we were always outdoors. The kids who stayed indoors were the odd ones. We didnt have any huge wide-open spaces, but we were always outdoors on the streetsin the vacant lots, jumping rope, or playing baseball or hopscotch. We were out there playing even after we got older.
Many of todays children show little inclination to go outdoors at all. Louv describes the environment as experienced by many American children as the third frontieran environment that is characterized by increasing distance from nature, an intellectualized understanding of the animal world, and a disconnection in the human consciousness between food and its origins.
That last point is of particular interest. Louv observes that many children have little knowledge of how food is produced. Lacking any experience with farming, livestock, and the food chain, these children simply assume that food is produced by something like a factory process. Young people may join animal rights groups without knowing anything about the actual animals involved. Louv argues that many college students become vegetarians without understanding that vegetables and vegetable byproducts are not manufactured indoors.
Richard Louv is a keen observerwatching our culture and taking careful note of how nature has become an abstraction for many of us. Why are so many Americans putting television and video screens in their vehicles? Louv observes: The highways edges may not be postcard perfect. But for a century, childrens early understanding of how cities and nature fit together was gained from the backseat: the empty farmhouse at the edge of the subdivision; the variety of architecture, here and there; the woods and fields and water beyond the seamy edgesall that was and still is available to the eye. This was the landscape that we watched as children. It was our drive-by movie.
These days, many parents allow kids to start the DVD player as soon as the car hits the interstate.
Interestingly, Louv also points to the epidemic of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder [ADHD], suggesting that a lack of contact with nature may be, at least in part, a cause for the attention deficit and disconnectedness experienced by many young childrenespecially young boys. He suggests that a nature-deficit disorder may be behind the phenomenon now routinely diagnosed as ADHD. Louv goes so far as to suggest that a dose of real contact with the natural world may be more powerful than Ritalin in helping children to overcome patterns of hyperactivity and distraction. The same prescription would likely help parents as well.
Richard Louv is a champion of nature, and Last Child in the Woods is a powerful call for human beings to reconnect with the natural world. It would do us all a world of good to take a walk in the woods, to play outdoors, and to remember that the world is filled with a variety of flora and fauna that defies the imagination and thrills the senses.
Last Child in the Woods is a fascinating book, though at times, Louv leans toward a form of nature mysticism. Nevertheless, Christians will read this book to great profit, remembering that the biblical worldview presents an affirmation of the goodness of creation. After all, Christians know that every atom and molecule of creation testifies of the glory of God.
This is our Fathers world, and we would do well to receive this world and enjoy it, while giving praise and glory to God for the beauty and bounty it contains. We understand that nature is not an end to itself, and we affirm that the creation exists as the theater of Gods glory for the drama of redemption. All this should help Christians to remember that we honor God most faithfully when we receive His good gifts most gratefully.
Christians should take the lead in reconnecting with nature and disconnecting from machines. Taking the kids for a long walk in the woods would be a great start.
“Actually the kids ARE safe but the way the press plays things up we think they arent. The truth is a kid is more likely to be hit by lightning than attacked by a predator, and if they are a victim of a predator its almost always going to be someone known to the family. But 2 generations have had stranger danger drilled into their heads and every time there is an abduction its massive national news so that just reinforces it.”
Get a black lab for your kids to hang out with. If you have ever seen a lab go after an animal that it thinks is a threat to their loved ones....man, it is awesome. I call it the “The Wall of Teeth”.
I can relate. My 3-year-old wants to “bring me flowers” by pulling up the vegetable plants. I love you, too, Frank, but I wanted those pretty purple flowers to turn into eggplants, and the tiny yellow ones were going to be tomatoes ...
Your post made me think of this song:The Jamies - Summertime, Summertime
ping
Coming from PA, but now living in IN, I can say we used to do the same thing. The best passer would stand in as "official QB" and would play offense for both teams.
We have several neighbors with children that are from Kindergarten - middle school. It is not unusual to see three or four playing on the golf course behind the tee box. Believe me, they all have a low BMI, and love to play together. Most ride scooters, skate boards or bikes.
I remember back in da day I used go to park across the street play on monkey bars and swing in 1970s in my neighorhood it was safe
I think start change in 1980s when gang members was shooting each other at the park that got so bad that they even advise don’t allow the kids play in the park themselves
I used go in late morning hour go home for lunch then come back come home in time of dinnertime for me it was 5pm
I remember back in da day I used go to park across the street play on monkey bars and swing in 1970s in my neighorhood it was safe
I think start change in 1980s when gang members was shooting each other at the park that got so bad that they even advise don’t allow the kids play in the park themselves
I used go in late morning hour go home for lunch then come back come home in time of dinnertime for me it was 5pm
Whenever I hear Monkey Bars, I think of the old Bill Cosby routine:
"As kids we knew the grownups were trying to murder us, to bump us off. We had a perfectly good playground....and then the grownups moved in......the monkey bars. The monkey bars came in....we lost 124 kids in one day."
“spent most of our playing time outdoors, building forts in the woods, exploring every nook and cranny of our yards..”
This child activity created the 1st Marine Division fighters who took Mt Suribachi on Iwo Jima, the 101st Airborne soldiers who fought the Nazis on Normandy, the Special Forces who kicked ass in Nam, and the Navy Seals who took down Osama.
Hooray for forts built of old boards, string and childhood memories.
I know, playing Swing the Statue, Kickball, Red Light-Green Light, Mother, May I?, look for toads in woods, frogs, lizards, catching Lightning bugs at twilight in the summer, etc..
I notice in our trailer park that kids still play out of doors a lot. There is a playground but they find places to play everywhere. It is possible that some more affluent kids may have a disadvantage here: too many indoor and electronic pastimes.
They tried to get us to do that at a retreat. I walked out and took the bus home.
I remember Spud! I also remember Red light-Green light, Swing the Statue Or did (have you ever heard of that one, or remember playing it?), One Potato-Two Potato, Engine, Engine No. Nine, (both played in groups with one player going around circle, hitting other fists with their own (not roughly)), going through the jingle until all players both fists are hit and they’re out! Then there was the jump-rope games, some jingles were “Charlie Chaplin went to France”, “Rich Man, Poor Man, Begger-man, Thief...”. There were so many fun games then! I try to remember them to teach my grand-kids!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.