No, Columbine was a "multiple active shooter" scenario as opposed to "mutiple carrier scenario" I referred to 'multiple concealed law abiding carriers'. People who would be aware of the consequences. A "perfect" scenario, absolutely not, but a whole heck of lot better than nothing.
Bottom line tho of my comment: People at least need to get their "what would I do" scenarios out of the fantasyland of the Old West...
Careful, your talking points are showing. These "wildwest" scenarios are not happening. They are liberal, sorry, socialist/communist, fantasies.
What? During the shootings you're going to have some of the shooters whip out their permits to distinguish themselves??? Really? Nobody would immediately (when it needs to happen) be able to readily tell the difference 'tween a "law abiding carrier" and a shooter. Plain and simple.
My thought is, if the criminal realized prior to the incident there might, or even probably would be, armed folks in the locale, he might not have even been there. Knowing it was a guns-free zone and that most are law abiding, well.... he had no such qualms.