Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: carriage_hill

The title of this article is misleading and is what I would expect to see on some envirowacko blog. It is not a “gold mine”, it is a COPPER MINE - “80 billion pounds of copper”. The envirowackos always use “gold mine” in a title to give the impression it is greedy miners out to destroy the earth.

We are already dependent on foreign oil, do we really need to be dependent on foreign copper too?


23 posted on 07/24/2012 2:24:07 PM PDT by epithermal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: epithermal

You are so right; it is misleading. I forgot to point that out in my original comments. Good catch. America has everything it needs to be totally self-sufficient AND export huge amounts to the world, as we used to do in agriculture.


28 posted on 07/24/2012 3:15:42 PM PDT by Carriage Hill (All libs and most dems think that life is just a sponge bath, with a happy ending.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: epithermal
Not to mention the hypocrisy of allowing China to mine the copper elsewhere using the most environmentally destructive techniques.

$500 billion can pay for a lot of protection up-front.

Where, by the way, were the salmon breeding during the last ice age a few thousand years ago? I saw some biologist talking about the danger of underground movement of waters in this area-- really? Through permafrost?

37 posted on 07/24/2012 10:14:34 PM PDT by pierrem15 (Claudius: "Let all the poisons that lurk in the mud hatch out.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson