Here is what I found from 1960/61. Scroll down to 6/12. Code 9 states ‘Other Non White’ while the liberal detractors say Zullo used a 1969 code 9 for ‘Not Stated’ in the press conference. Zullo did mention those words.
Look again. That is the race of the CHILD, not the father.
“Here is what I found from 1960/61. Scroll down to 6/12. Code 9 states ‘Other Non White’ while the liberal detractors say Zullo used a 1969 code 9 for ‘Not Stated’ in the press conference. Zullo did mention those words.”
Well, I’ve found the same thing. The Federal Government did not bother to record the race of the parents, but, only the race of the child. In 1961 a 9 certainly did mean “Other Non white”, and by using that code, the system would not have listed Obama’s race as a negro.
Zullo and Corsi set this false info up and they can claim that they got this info from Verna K L Lee. Remember, she’s 95 years old, and probably just forgot that the meaning of a 9 changed in the later 1960’s.
I’ve noticed two other things though. The Feds did track Month of birth. August is the 8th month, yet on Obama’s Birth Certificate, you’ll see it was coded as a 1, meaning January in the time of birth slot. Also, on the Nordyke twins Birth Certificates, their births are coded as 1-2 and 2-2 just like one would number boxes being shipped. Obama’s should have been coded as 1-1, but instead it says X - X. An X means “not stated”.