UN arms treaty aims at terror, but puts Second Amendment in crosshairs

FoxNews.com ^ | July 21, 2012 | Steven Edwards

[kitchen]

That's an awfully big hole in the ground. How long do you think it took them to back fill to the original contour?

[lentulusgracchus]

The legal challenges would be overwhelming and that would include state nullification on a large scale, like we’re beginning to see with the Obamacare ruling.

Nullification is a non-starter. Look up Jefferson Davis's Inaugural in 1861 (he was inaugurated twice, once to the presidency of the provisional Confederate government, and once to the permanent one). It was already a dead idea. That's why the South seceded instead. There is no method or resource for interposition of the States between federal law and the Citizenry, save the 10th Amendment and the People in convention assembled.

[Travis McGee]

They don’t bury them there, it’s just an execution wall created with a bulldozer. They “harvest” the organs in waiting ambulances just behind the firing line. No kidding.

[kitchen]

Two tenets of socialism juxtapositioned for all to see: government health care and gun control. How did these true believers let a profit motive slip in?

Just for a moment, mind you, I wondered if it would be possible to volunteer for Hell, only to be in charge of tormenting these bastards for all of eternity.

[Travis McGee]

You packed a lot of great questions into a few succinct lines.