Such an asinine accusation deserves no response, and you only diminish yourself in making it.
Enough.
A later SEC filing that references the November 1999 Schedule 13D.
[Excerpts:]
NOTICE & PROXY STATEMENT
SCHEDULE 14A
STERICYCLE, INC.
NOTICE OF 2001 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON MAY 15, 2001
PROXY STATEMENT
STOCK OWNERSHIP
Bain Entities(3),(4) 2,218,724 11.25 %
c/o Bain Capital, Inc.
Two Copley Place
Boston, Massachusetts 02116
A Schedule 13D, dated November 22, 1999, jointly filed by the Bain Entities and the MDP Entities reported that each of the Bain Entities has sole voting and sole dispositive power with respect to its shares.
The Schedule 13D also reported that (1) other entities related to Bain Capital, Inc., in their roles as general partners of the Bain Entities, may be deemed to control some of the Bain Entities and thus share voting and dispositive power with respect to their shares, and that (2) W. Mitt Romney, an individual, may be deemed to share voting and dispositive power with respect to 2,116,588 shares of common stock in his capacity as the sole shareholder of Bain Capital, Inc. and of other entities that serve as general partners of the Bain Entities.
Which part of Eternal Vigilance's description of Mittler "pro-choice democrat GOP nominee" do you find asinine and why? Facts and proof in addition to any mere editorials.