Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ArrogantBustard

“How does that intensity compare to conventional tube fluorescent lights?”

The report’s omission of a comparison with conventional fluorescnts is evidence to me that it’s objective is sensational or political rather than informative.


13 posted on 07/23/2012 9:47:06 AM PDT by cymbeline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: cymbeline
it’s objective is sensational or political rather than informative.

I agree. Sadly, lots of folks will fall for it.

The incandescent ban sucks; every congressthing that voted for it should be subjected to merciless derision. Likewise the president who signed it. They're fools and idiots, one and all.

The case against the ban is not helped by bad science.

16 posted on 07/23/2012 10:06:08 AM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson