Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tax-chick

Thanks. I did not read that carefully, or perhaps I would not have referred to an ongoing marriage as “a previous relationship.”


64 posted on 07/22/2012 3:59:45 PM PDT by madprof98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]


To: madprof98

It was poorly written. Most of us think of currently being married as ... well, currently being married, but if they were going to mention the children, something had to be said to indicate that his present girlfriend wasn’t their mother.

Ah, the confusion of modern life ... and of course, when one is dead, all “relationships” become “previous,” so to speak.

And that said, saving the life of an innocent woman, whether it was his girlfriend or a total stranger, was the right thing to do.


65 posted on 07/22/2012 4:04:50 PM PDT by Tax-chick ("Too many birthdays to keep track, and no one willing to take them back." ~NicknamedBob)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson