Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ransomnote

I think its an intentional tactic of the anti nuke power industry to overstate the dangers and impact of accidents.

All while you are burning electricity.


15 posted on 07/22/2012 4:37:53 AM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: driftdiver

There it is again, the snarled hint that the public are ingrates (all the while burning electricity).

The nuke industry always understates harm done. For years they denied that fatalities exceeded 46 people for Chernobyl. To this day you can’t get a nuke shill to admit the damage to human quality of life continues to unfold in the Ukraine - they act like they successfully washed their hands sparkling clean and have a clean record.
Was just reading up on another partial meltdown that occurred in CA in 1959 resulting in the release of radioactive gas over the San Fernando Valley (clean clean clean - you’ll never see the nuke shills admit to that!) Oh the 50 year roof that was eaten through in a day or two when 3 mile melted and released radiation (CLEAN! THEIR HANDS ARE CLEAN! They still deny responsibility). The nuke industry lacks a conscience so claiming the REAL problem is overstatement comes easily to them. Why there are nuke shills who act like Fukushima is over and no one was harmed. No harm, no foul...no truth in the nuke industry. Because the truth limits their ability to abuse the public trust and feel superior while doing it.


25 posted on 07/22/2012 6:02:48 PM PDT by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson