Well, I’m anti stupid wars, but I’m no liberal nor a Democrat. Haven’t seen anyone say what the goal is in Iraq or Afghanistan. Saying we fight a global war on terror (terror being a tactic, and thus, incapable of surrender) means the government can start a war at any time and continue it perpetually. We are sacrificing our good men and women for what exactly?
We get nothing, not even the oil.
I said "many" NOT "all". I'm sure you can agree with me on what was said in my comment.
Of course there are legit Libertarians and legit Constitutionalists who support the man.
But there are many anti-war, liberal democrats who also "supported" him in the GOP Primaries but doubtful they were really planning on voting for him in the general.
On balance, the Democrat record is worse in all regards: politics, freedom, war, ethics, morality, economics. It's a no-contest, no-brainer decision.