Not all GOP activists are rapists.
Go back to Du where those filled with hate reside.
Who made the claim they were?
(You're addressing a straw man argument nobody has claimed)
But for the one who appears to be such a rapist, you're not standing by his side as his advocate, are you?
Should we not condemn rape?
Should we not stand by the victims?
Where are your words of advocacy for the victims?
Why do we only see apparent advocacy for this accused rapist?
This all comes across quite striking as to where your priorities lie (so please address those priorities). Because you're giving off a few hints that your priorities lie with protecting the reputation of GOP activists.
(And if you're going to keep the focus of this thread only on the political links of this story...vs. the criminal justice component and the compassion on behalf of the victims... how is that going to come across to undecided female posters and lurkers reading this thread?)
Who said they were?
Name names if that is the case.
Go back to Du?
What is that an ice cream parlor?
I have an idea, why not dispute the evidence presented that this GOP activist, who is a mormon. is not a rapist as shown.
Is he not a GOP activist is that part of the story incorrect?
Is he not a mormon is that part of the story incorrect?
Are the authors of the story not an lds owned conglomerate?
Just which part is incorrect that would apparently cause such agitation on your part?
Are you as agitated when stories are posted about Catholics, Baptist or say Lutherans are posted?
Is this a special case because a particular candidate you maybe supporting also happens to have the same belief system?
Why is it that this apparently bothers you above all else?