Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ctdonath2

Sorry, but this is simply babbling nonsense. The paper copies and PDF weren’t generated from decades-old data. The alleged long-form would have been a hard copy that had to be copied onto a current form. It wouldn’t be in any kind of data form. This is really a new low in fogger-styled excuses.


26 posted on 07/20/2012 3:36:43 PM PDT by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: edge919

[shrug] Whatever. I just know from having been involved in document processing at the time that it was common for warehouses of important paper documents to be digitized, processed, and destroyed - leaving only a mangled image file as I described. Any printed copies would be rendered from that data (perhaps run thru a few layers of modernization software, producing “haloing” and related artifacts) and printed on new green-hash “security” paper, or .PDF files generated with a similar background.

Believe me or not. I’m trying to help; ignore the past at your peril.


33 posted on 07/20/2012 3:48:39 PM PDT by ctdonath2 ($1 meals: http://abuckaplate.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: edge919; ctdonath2
Sorry, but this is simply babbling nonsense. The paper copies and PDF weren’t generated from decades-old data. The alleged long-form would have been a hard copy that had to be copied onto a current form. It wouldn’t be in any kind of data form. This is really a new low in fogger-styled excuses.

Right. No fancy digital mumbo-jumbo is involved when copying a document from microfiche onto security paper.

65 posted on 07/20/2012 8:13:12 PM PDT by thecodont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson