Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Another doctored image deepens Obama mystery
WND ^ | July 18, 2012 | Jerome R. Corsi

Posted on 07/18/2012 7:04:39 PM PDT by Smokeyblue

Does a family photograph of a young Barack Obama posted on the president’s Facebook campaign page offer a clue to the identity of his real father?

A professional graphic artist who examined the 1973 photo believes the image of Obama’s mother, Ann Dunham, was airbrushed into the scene to cover up an African-American man who was standing next to Obama at the Honolulu airport.

Filmmaker Joel Gilbert, who commissioned the analysis, told WND there’s substantial evidence that the man in the original photograph was Frank Marshall Davis, the Communist Party member, pro-Soviet propagandist and pornographer who played a fatherly role in Obama’s teen years.

In his full-length documentary “Dreams from My Real Father,” Gilbert presents a compelling case that Davis was Obama’s biological father as well as his ideological mentor. He believes the Dunham family recruited the Kenyan student Barack Hussein Obama to act as the father, to cover up an illicit affair with a subversive political activist.

Gilbert posted a page on his website at the time this article was published with details of his find.

Gilbert says the black male hand under Obama’s armpit is strikingly similar to the right hand of Davis.

“We know from Obama’s own writing and interviews with Davis’ neighbors, that Obama was a regular visitor to Davis’ house from age 10,” Gilbert told WND. “This doctored photo on Obama’s own Facebook page seems to be part of a pattern of document forgery by President Obama to hide his biological and ideological relationship to communist Frank Marshall Davis.”

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; frankmarshalldavis; naturalborncitizen; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-174 next last
To: GeorgeWashingtonsGhost

And one shadow.


61 posted on 07/19/2012 1:51:28 PM PDT by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Smokeyblue

I use Photoshop professionally and I would say that there is a very high chance that this photo is “shopped,” except that this is such a low res example it is tough to really say for sure.

Some things that stand out:

1. Lower right edge of her dress. That dark line is different from what you would expect to see and could be the remnants from something that was in the her original photo (a dark background on original in that area).

At first I thought that it was just the seat support behind her (and it could be up to a point), except that the dark line extends to her foot.

2. Black, or gloved, hand. Simply put, humans have pretty regular conformations and the human forearm is roughly the length of a person’s foot. The forearm in this photo is grotesquely elongated.

Even if she were wearing a sheer-typed glove, her forearm is too long to fit with the hand as it is positioned in this photo.

3. Something that may be hard to explain, but immediately jumped out to me is that if you printed this photo and then took a straight ruler and placed it along the edge of the top side of the white wall in the background you would find that it is straight all of the way across.

If you place the ruler on the lower edge of the white wall you will find that the left side of her dress is raised up slightly and not in line.

It’s just odd.

4. The lighting isn’t quite right on her face, but that would be hard to judge unless you know how the light is getting into the room (windows, glass, &c.?) and if something were blocking it in places.

5. Hair. The hair above her left shoulder appears to “fade” away. Hair does not do that in reality, but it often does it in bad photoshopping. Hair is often a tale-tell sign.

It would be nice to have a higher res version to see better - especially her hair.


62 posted on 07/19/2012 1:51:35 PM PDT by Noamie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle

Again. Same kid. Not Obama.


63 posted on 07/19/2012 1:51:35 PM PDT by squarebarb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Smokeyblue

http://www.facebook.com/#!/photo.php?fbid=10150902091511749&set=a.10150902090006749.401812.6815841748&type=3&theater

Holy crap its right there!


64 posted on 07/19/2012 1:52:04 PM PDT by GlockThe Vote (The Obama Adminstration: 2nd wave of attacks on America after 9/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boiler Plate
If you run a line that follows the bottom of the wall from right to left it doesn’t match on the other side of Stanley Ann.

Good pick up.

If you look at the bottom right of the wall it looks like an indentation about 4 inches high, yet there is no indentation on the left side of Stanley Ann.

65 posted on 07/19/2012 1:54:44 PM PDT by New Perspective (Proud father of a 8 yr old son with Down Syndrome and fighting to keep him off Obama's death panels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Rona_Badger

I never said the hardcopy originals were cut and pasted. It goes without saying that in Photoshop you use jpegs or other digital formats or scans of originals. Sheesh.


66 posted on 07/19/2012 1:57:57 PM PDT by GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

You ask: “Serious question ~ why would the commies have to infiltrate the dock workers in Hawaii in the 1940s. Weren’t they under commie rule from the late 1910s?”

Well, you’ve got me stumped — there was a lot of new information for me in this film. When it came to the dock workers my thoughts went to Mafia control — but guess that was more East Coast. Maybe the film is at your library — I viewed a friend’s copy and no longer obtainable to check. Sorry.


67 posted on 07/19/2012 1:58:20 PM PDT by bunster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: GeorgeWashingtonsGhost

No, it wasn’t you, it was another person and you had said that didn’t make sense. I’m agreeing with you, Sheesh.


68 posted on 07/19/2012 1:59:15 PM PDT by Rona Badger (Heeds the Calling Wind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: svcw

What??!!11!!!!

Obama did a Michael Jackson?


69 posted on 07/19/2012 2:02:48 PM PDT by Sir Napsalot (Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: tsowellfan

Pops!


70 posted on 07/19/2012 2:06:02 PM PDT by Hotlanta Mike (Resurrect the House Committee on Un-American Activities (HUAC)...before there is no America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: bunster
Just doing a quick run through Google.com to see if there are references, they all neatly start at 1935 when the gang in Moscow authorized payments to agents to be assigned to Hawaii..

What that means is that whoever it was that was messing around in Hawaii earlier become inconvenient and they were simply disappeared.

Not surprised at all that Google.com is not showing a net reference. Will probably need to go to another browser to see what it shows.

There were STRIKES by field worker organizations earlier ~

71 posted on 07/19/2012 2:06:48 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
Raise your hand if you think 0bama's head looks way to big here..............
72 posted on 07/19/2012 2:08:41 PM PDT by Hotlanta Mike (Resurrect the House Committee on Un-American Activities (HUAC)...before there is no America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Boiler Plate; New Perspective
If you run a line that follows the bottom of the wall from right to left it doesn’t match on the other side of Stanley Ann.

It doesn't look like it, but it does. If you put something with a straight edge up against your monitor you'll see that they do line up.

73 posted on 07/19/2012 2:10:16 PM PDT by Darth Reardon (No offense to drunken sailors)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

I do remember that Seattle was another dockworker site mentioned along with Hawaii — maybe you’ll find more there on the port infiltration.

You are serious aren’t you (smile)


74 posted on 07/19/2012 2:16:10 PM PDT by bunster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: bunster

Communists were big on doctoring photos long before it became easy with home computers. And they made stupid mistakes too - like the kind shown here...


75 posted on 07/19/2012 2:19:36 PM PDT by GOPJ (Political correctness is simply George Orwell's Newspeak by a non-threatening name. FR- Bernard Marx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: squarebarb

That kid doesn’t look like Obama. He’s in a number of photos, including the grade-school pic in the Honolulu Star and one with Stanley at a zoo. all the same kid, totyally different from Obama. I’ve commented on this before so if I am boring everybody, well, that’s what I do.


He looks pudgy, whereas Obama has a lean frame.


76 posted on 07/19/2012 2:24:11 PM PDT by Hotlanta Mike (Resurrect the House Committee on Un-American Activities (HUAC)...before there is no America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

Like everything O does I asked myself why would he bother to put himself into the photo in NY park. And all I can think of is when trying to compose “a life” the NY Columbia College years must have lacked “presentable” photos to pretend he was really there. He probably found the original in a box when he visited granny’s deathbed apartment.


77 posted on 07/19/2012 2:25:55 PM PDT by bunster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: bunster

http://www.wnd.com/2012/07/another-doctored-image-deepens-obama-mystery

unreal.

I went to Obama’s facebook page and he is getting slammed on the site for this fake photo.

LOL!!!!


78 posted on 07/19/2012 2:26:30 PM PDT by GlockThe Vote (The Obama Adminstration: 2nd wave of attacks on America after 9/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Sarajevo

Hilarious!


79 posted on 07/19/2012 2:27:13 PM PDT by Deb (Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick
holy crap, that is a black man’s hand

Oh, please. It is well-known that Stanley Ann sported a black man's hand at the end of her right arm.

She had been injured in a freak peasant-blacksmithing accident in Indonesia.

At one time during her observation of peasant blacksmithing, Stanley Ann (thanks to her exquisitely sensitive class consciousness) recognized that a peasant blacksmith’s surplus labor value was being exploited by a capitalist ironmonger.

In an effort to stop the exploitation, she immediately placed her hand between the hammer and the anvil, but unfortunately the peasant blacksmith noticed her action too late and the result was the total loss of her right hand.

In an amazing act of self-sacrifice intended to inspire progressives everywhere, Frank Marshall Davis cut off one of his own hands which he then provided to the surgical team treating Stanley Ann as a replacement for her lost hand.

Usually Stanley Ann for cosmetic reasons wore a skin-tight flesh tone-colored glove over her replaced right hand, but as we can all see she just so happened not to be wearing her glove at the time this photo was taken.

80 posted on 07/19/2012 2:27:38 PM PDT by Meet the New Boss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-174 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson