Check out the thread about Christie giving the keynote address at the convention.
You'll find several naysayers there.
Ask your host. For me, I am not voting for either. I must be influential. Since the prevailing logic is that my failure to vote for Romney is a vote for Obama, that means that my failure to vote for Obama is a vote for Romney. Add those two votes to my write in and I get three votes.
Not only deny this thug another term but continue to vet him even when he’s out of office. He will NEVER go away.
“I don’t know how anyone here cannot agree that our top priority should be to deny this thug another term.”
Not me. I want Obama to win. Don’t get me wrong, I hate both Obama and his policies. And I don’t subscribe to this idea that Romney is such a centrist that he’s practically indistinguishable from Obama. Romney is clearly more conservative than Obama, but Romney and succeeding Conservative candidates will likely just nibble around the corners of the damage that Progerssives have done. Then, once in power again, Progressives will offset those Conservative advances, and continue to march America toward it’s demise.
What we need in this country is a revolution. With that in mind, worse is better. Worse wakens people up to the damage being done by Liberalism. Worse motivates people that matters will not be corrected within the framework of our current government. Worse is an Obama second term, but worse may be better.