Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hannibaal
We are juggling now—Obama wants both the Islamists and commies to win but he can't have both in either Egypt nor Syria—so he is providing support to whoever, at the time, is most likely to destroy Israel—his primary enemy.

We have wanted to remove the Soviet spawn Syrian commies since Nixon and now that time has come—if Obama is reelected the Islamists in both countries will win and both America and the Jews will be constantly attacked—but if the GOP wins in November conservative influences (aka shock n awe or else) will persuade the Sunni Muslim radicals to not only make nice but to convince their Shia rectum brothers to think twice.

29 posted on 07/18/2012 7:44:57 AM PDT by Happy Rain ("Obamacare like all Marxist fails, outlaws redress before increasing it's demand.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: Happy Rain

Firstly, Syria is not a threat to israel under assad. Allowing Sunni radicals to take over syria makes Israel virtually surrounded. People were cheering like you when mubarak was deposed in egypt and look, the treaty between israel and egypt is shaky at best and will likely be null and void should there be a coming altercation in the region.
Sunnis are not better than shiites. I would much rather have a person in power who is a strong man and clamps down on islamic extremism (Assad), than any alternative. Muslim nations need strong men to squash any religious extremism, it is their mentality, they are not suited for democracy, the radicals eventhough less in number than the moderates intimidate the living hell out of other muslims forcing them to agree with them else face some sort of retribution.


37 posted on 07/19/2012 1:33:52 PM PDT by hannibaal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson