Replies

"So I see you've clarified your original assertion about a general "gun ban" that did not exist. "
A gun ban is a gun ban moron.
And any ban is bad.
Keep backpedaling Andy.
It amuses me that you keep trying to change what you initially claimed.
You cannot change the fact that Romney signed in July 8 2004 a ban on guns.
A ban is a a ban, period.

"Of course, we all know that "assault weapon" is a euphemism for "whatever looks kinda scary", so that was a cop-out on his part."

Funny, you admit that a ban is a ban here.
But then you turn around and try to claim a ban is not a ban by using weasel words.

No sale andy.

"What Romney did sign was an (admittedly noxious) assault weapons ban, which was the price extracted from him by an 85% Democrat legislature"
So Romney is a wuss who can't govern without caving to the whims of a bunch of whiners.

Keep wiggling andy.
Tell me again how a gun ban is not a gun ban.

Okay, smartass. Now try responding to a post you haven't already responded to.

And by all means, please go on with your silly name-calling while ignoring the fact that you stated something that is demonstrably false. Romney did not ban all guns in Massachusetts. It never happened.

As I explained (and as you choose to ignore), he approved an assault-weapons ban as part of a trade-off deal to make other firearms purchases and licensing requirements less cumbersome.