Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SWEETSUNNYSOUTH

A shame, but not surprising - he was shooting after they were retreating. CCW 101 is you shoot to stop the threat, and as they were falling over one another to get away the threat had already been stopped. Hopefully that decision doesn’t bankrupt him.


10 posted on 07/17/2012 12:39:01 PM PDT by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: mvpel; All

CCW 101 is you shoot to stop the threat, and as they were falling over one another to get away the threat had already been stopped.

At least one had a gun. The fact that he was moving away in no way removes the threat until he is out of range.


12 posted on 07/17/2012 12:45:06 PM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: mvpel; waterhill; mylife; ixtl
A shame, but not surprising - he was shooting after they were retreating. CCW 101 is you shoot to stop the threat, and as they were falling over one another to get away the threat had already been stopped. Hopefully that decision doesn’t bankrupt him.

+1. Easy to say, but probably harder to do when your adrenaline is pumping.

Anybody know what state this was in? I would no-bill him if I were on the jury.

Must see video (((ping))).

13 posted on 07/17/2012 12:45:24 PM PDT by Envisioning (Call me a racist........, one more time..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: mvpel

Hope you’re right about not bankrupting him. Maybe he shouldn’t have fired at them after they started to run, but under stress who knows what a person would do?


14 posted on 07/17/2012 12:45:31 PM PDT by SWEETSUNNYSOUTH (Liberalism is a mental disease.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: mvpel

“A shame, but not surprising - he was shooting after they were retreating. CCW 101 is you shoot to stop the threat, and as they were falling over one another to get away the threat had already been stopped. Hopefully that decision doesn’t bankrupt him.”

So you are all for letting criminal get away to victimize others another day?


18 posted on 07/17/2012 12:55:47 PM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: mvpel

Have to disagree with you: even though the perps were “retreating”, they were still a threat while they were able to turn and shoot. As far as anyone could assume, both crooks were armed and meant to kill. If they recovered their nerves and turned back, the victims would have been placed in danger again.. The lesson I learned in Vietnam was to keep shooting until they’re down, then keep shooting to make sure they stay down, forever. Ammo is cheap and life isn’t.


44 posted on 07/17/2012 1:52:16 PM PDT by Chainmail (Warfare is too serious to be left to the amateurs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: mvpel

I don’t agree the threat was over...most invasions involve 4 people...I think the threat isn’t over until the room is secured and you have checked the back door as well.

Just because they are retreating doesn’t mean they aren’t trying to draw you into someone else’s fire or trying to regroup.


61 posted on 07/17/2012 6:24:49 PM PDT by willyd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: mvpel

I don’t agree the threat was over...most invasions involve 4 people...I think the threat isn’t over until the room is secured and you have checked the back door as well.

Just because they are retreating doesn’t mean they aren’t trying to draw you into someone elses fire or trying to regroup.


62 posted on 07/17/2012 6:25:27 PM PDT by willyd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson