The statements of hers released yesterday were made on March 20th. One of the two recordings goes tho this racism allegation, and she recants her allegation by saying she doesn't know of any incidence of George acting or talking racist.
But that Feb 28 statement is still out there, and one might wonder what motivated her to make it? Well, cure the unwelcome sexual advances statement. She's had this bad feeling about amorous George for a decade. While at a glance, her allegation appears only damaging to Zimmerman, it also cuts against her credibility as far as her racial allegations against Zimmerman.
I think O'Mara would want to know all this about her - the fact that it's public, now instead of later, is an artifact of Florida's sunshine law. I don;t blame the system - W9 decided her experience with George was relevant to the case, so it all comes in.
The public reaction is unpredictable, except die-hard Martin supporters will continue to be irrational.
But did it have to become public for O'Mara to know about all that she said??
Isn't there some stuff that is released to the defense but not the public??
If it is so good for O'Mara to know this stuff, then why did he fight so hard to keep it from being released???
Here check this out:
http://www.miamiherald.com/2012/07/16/2898502/jail-call-says-defense-attorney.html#storylink=cpy
O’Mara knew about the Paypal money as early as April 14th and he and the prosecutor and the judge all just played stupid.