Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: philman_36
Shall I go find an old reply of mine to disabuse you of that assumption as well or will you "take my word for it"? LOL

I don't think that's necessary, but it was an accurate conclusion based upon what you said at the time, not an "assumption." I try not to do the latter unless for the purpose of testing a hypothetical construction.

67 posted on 07/16/2012 11:30:09 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (The Slave Party Switcheroo: Economic crisis! Zero's eligibility Trumped!! Hillary 2012!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]


To: Carry_Okie
...it was an accurate conclusion based upon what you said at the time...

Whatever. Yours wasn't a conclusive conclusion, it was a restrictive conclusion.

71 posted on 07/16/2012 11:37:56 PM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson