Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin

And while we’re on the subject of TAXES:

Direct Deposit tax HR4646 ON JANUARY 1, 2013, (which will soon be here!)

THE US GOVERNMENT WILL BE REQUIRING EVERYONE TO HAVE DIRECT DEPOSIT FOR SS CHECKS.

Subject: HR 4646 Be sure to read entire explanation

Watch for this AFTER November elections; remember this BEFORE you VOTE, in case you think Obama is looking out for your best interest. A 1% tax on all bank transactions is what HR 4646 calls for.

Do you receive a paycheck, or a retirement check from Social Security or a pension fund and have it direct deposit?? Well guess what ... It looks as if Obama wants to tax it 1% !!! This bill was put forth by Rep. Chaka Fattah (D-PA).

YES, that is 1% tax on all bank transactions - HR 4646, every time it goes in and every time money goes out. 1% tax on all bank transactions ~ HR 4646 - ANOTHER NEW OBAMA TAX SLIPPED IN WHILE WE WERE ASLEEP.

Checked this on snopes, it’s true! Check it out yourself ~ HR 4646. President Obama’s finance team is recommending a one percent (1%) transaction fee (TAX). Obama’s plan is to sneak it in after the November elections to keep it under the radar.

This is a 1% tax on all transactions at any financial institution - banks, credit unions, savings and loans, etc. Any deposit you make, or even a transfer within your own bank from one account to another, will have a 1% tax charged.

If your paycheck or your Social Security or whatever is direct deposit, it will get a 1% tax charged for the transaction. If your paycheck is $1000, then you will pay Obama $10 just for the privilege of depositing your paycheck in your bank.

Even if you hand carry your paycheck or any check in to your bank for a deposit, 1% tax will be charged. You receive a $5,000 stock dividend from your broker, Obama takes $50 just to allow you to deposit that check in the bank. If you take $1,000 cash to deposit at your bank, 1% tax will be charged.

Mind you, this is from the man who promised that, if you make under $250,000 per year, you will not see one penny of new tax. Keep your eyes and ears open, you will be amazed at what you learn about this guy’s under-the-table moves to increase the number of ways you are taxed.

Oh, and by the way, if you receive a refund from the IRS next year and you have it direct deposited or you walk in to deposit that check, you guessed it.

You will pay a 1% charge of that money just for putting it in your bank. Remember, any money, cash, check or whatever, no matter where it came from, you will pay a 1% fee if you put it in the bank. Some will say, oh well, it’s just 1%. Are you kidding me? It’s a 1% tax increase across the board. Remember, once the tax is there, they can also raise it at will. And if anyone protests, they will just say, “Oh,that’s not really a tax, it’s a user fee”!

Think this is no big deal? Go back and look at the transactions you made from last year’s banking statements. Then add the total of all those transactions and deduct 1%. Still think it’s no big deal?

WHEN DID THE GOV. EVER NOT INCREASE A TAX ONCE IT WAS VOTED IN. THIS ONLY THE BEGINNING THE 1% WILL BECOME 2% WITH NO STOPING IN SIGHT REMEMBER THE LOCK BOX OUR S.S. MONEY WAS IN.

The following is copied from Snopes:

1. snopes.com : Debt Free America Act... Is the U.S.government proposing a 1% tax on debit card usage and/or banking transactions? ...It is true. The bill is HR-4646 introduced by US Rep Peter deFazio D-Oregon and US Senator Tom Harkin D-Iowa. Their plan is to sneak it in after the... ...moved beyond proposing studies and submitted the Debt Free America Act (H.R. 4646), a bill calling for the implementation of a scheme to pay down the......[2010] by Rep. Chaka Fattah (D-Pa.). His “Debt Free America Act” (H.R. 4646) would impose a 1 percent “transaction tax” on every financial transaction...Wed, 02 Nov 201111:27:37 MThttp://www.snopes.com/politics/taxes/debtfree.asp


4 posted on 07/16/2012 4:45:36 AM PDT by SMARTY ("The man who has no inner-life is a slave to his surroundings. "Henri Frederic Amiel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SMARTY

This a “proposal” and not a tax which is in place or even set to become law, am I right? Doesn’t the House have to pass on any tax legislation?

My understanding is this has not yet been formally sent to the House as yet. My personal opinion is it has no chance whatever of passing.


13 posted on 07/16/2012 5:25:08 AM PDT by drago15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: SMARTY

I guess I should have followed your link before responding earlier. If Snopes is to be believed they claim it is not true and there is not yet a law and bill doesn’t seem to have the support of even one other elected official.

Obama is bad enough and has done plenty of harm without us here having to make up things about the pos.


14 posted on 07/16/2012 5:25:36 AM PDT by drago15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: SMARTY
The bill is HR-4646 introduced by US Rep Peter deFazio D-Oregon and US Senator Tom Harkin D-Iowa.

Are you kidding? My representative that is now running for his 14th term wants more money for the federal coffers?

DeFazio is going down this November, we have a great challenger, Go Art Robinson!!

21 posted on 07/16/2012 7:14:21 AM PDT by thirst4truth (www.Believer.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: SMARTY

Wonder how long it’ll be before taxes are protection rackets in deed rather than just in theory (ie, pay us the money or we send government boys to work you over)?


22 posted on 07/16/2012 7:21:00 AM PDT by RWB Patriot ("My ability is a value that must be purchased and I don't recognize anyone's need as a claim on me.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson