>> it’s literally the only option open for me as I refuse to vote for Romney because to do so would be to vote against my own interests both morally and politically.
I understand, Finny. I’m in no way questioning what’s in your heart.
I’m simply curious about the expectations of the passive vote. You make interesting points, and I would expect others to fall in line behind you.
>> I believe our system is enough still intact that indeed, a plurality lack-of-mandate for the president matters no matter WHO it involves.
I hope you’re right.
Thanks so much for such a civil exchange. :^)