To: Tallguy
Just love how after all these years the USN can stick to these vague speed claims for our Nimitz-class carriers. It's a bit like if the USAF stopped making speed claims for their combat aircraft immediately after Chuck Yeager broke the sound barrier.
Actually, that "30+" is pretty accurate. Unless the USN is outright lying about how much SHP the turbines generate, the later Nimitz-class (which is really broken into four subclasses with each ship being fairly unique) should have a hard time reaching 31 kts.
A lot of people get hung up on the concept that "nuclear" conveys some sort of mystical superpowers on ships. In reality, the reactors are just a highly complex way of boiling water in unlimited quantities. The limitations on speed are driven more by hull form and the turbines than on the reactors (which can generate much more steam than the turbines could possibly absorb).
To: tanknetter
I beg to differ regarding the speed, but won’t comment further.
57 posted on
07/14/2012 1:01:50 PM PDT by
wxgesr
(I want to be the first person to surf on another planet.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson