Replies

Here’s something that might be pertinent.

Barbara Bush is widely known to be the most politically astute/savvy member of the family, as well as it’s “enforcer”. Seriously. Years ago I ran in a social circle that included members of Bush41’s advance team and to a man they all agreed that if there was one person in the family you did not want to get on the bad side of, it was Barbara. She’d shiv you and toss you out the rear door of AF1 in an instant.

In this article there are three things that bear noting. One, the general chumminess of the family with Clinton. Two, the comment about how Clinton gets along with “all” the brothers. Three, the comment about how Clinton doesn’t say a bad word about anyone.

Being a country club Liberal/Rockefeller Republican/RINO aside, I don’t think Barbara would say something like this unless there was a purpose behind it. Heck, even her “rhymes with witch” comment about Gerry Ferraro back in 1984 was deliberate and planned.

Now, why would she want to point out - now - how close her family is with Clinton, the fact that “all” the brothers get along well with him and that Clinton never speaks badly of them?

It’s almost like she’s trying to get ahead of the curve on something (aka political inoculation). Against a guy who is a HUGE fundraising and GOTV producer for the Democrats.

Mittens still hasn’t settle on a VP yet? Or has he?