Replies

You really have to wonder if they pay people to conduct such drivel. It's 2900 "adults" of which they include "2300 registered voters." Huh?

So, I'm assuming that fully 25% of the people who are not even registered voters probably don't even know who Mitt Romney is; most probably don't know this is an election year.

If you cull that 25% out, somehow, you are STILL stuck with the unreliable "registered voters," not "likely voters." They try to obfuscate their incredibly bad sample by simply enlarging it. But if you enlarge your sample of a field of manure by adding more manure fields, guess what you get?

Still, this allows RCP to lick its lips and change its more accurate numbers to show a steady Obama lead.