No, and I’ve already said that I clumsily and inaccurately applied the word, “swishy”. He did not speak in an effected manner, or at all like an effeminate homosexual male, but in a way that was natural to him. No one “groomed” him, but it is incredible that you presume such intimate knowledge of events, personalities, and natures in the lives of a family you do not know.
No, and I’ve already said that I clumsily and inaccurately applied the word, “swishy”. He did not speak in an effected manner, or at all like an effeminate homosexual male, but in a way that was natural to him. No one “groomed” him, but it is incredible that you presume such intimate knowledge of events, personalities, and natures in the lives of a family you do not know.
I never “presumed intimate knowledge.” I responded based on your ever changing story.
If he didn’t behave “swishy,” why did you lead with “swishy?” Either he acted “swishy” as a small child or he didn’t.
Are you now saying he acted like a “normal” three year old boy or did he act “girly?” If he acted “girly” did he act more “girly” than his sister?
You appear to be pushing a “born that way” agenda while attempting to appear uncommitted.