I think it might be about time for a birth certificate to come to light that accompanied the divorce application...something that follows the most recent forgery to the letter. It's the last opportunity they have to make good on that disgusting fake they showed us...I think maybe the 'news' has been leaked, if fogbow is rife with the rumour. (Not that I read fogbow myself, but there are Freepers telling us what to expect.) Not that a better forgery will change anything much. She still got custody of a child that wasn't hers, when she was granted the divorce.
What did she have to substantiate the 'marriage' when asked for it in 1965? This is what she had:
And she didn't produce that until Lolo Soetoro's application was on the verge of DENIAL. She was living in Hawaii and couldn't produce a copy of a Marriage Certificate...BUT SHE DID GET A DIVORCE? Heaven help me, how many times have you been told it's raining while they have been peeing on your leg? Don't forget now, when you go into the woods, wear little bells and carry pepper spray...LOL! (Marxist feces is full of little bells and smells of pepper.)
Thanks for posting that interesting INS document from the Lolo file. However Lolo and Stanley Ann were not asked to document her prior marriage to BHO Sr but rather her divorce.
In the BHO Sr. INS docs, Sr. is suspected by INS of entering into a bigamous marriage to gain an immigration advantage.
In contrast, in the 1965 Lolo docs, INS suspects Stanley Ann of entering into a bigamous marriage to aid Lolo and demands, in the file page you posted, that proof of “term.” (termination) of the 1st marriage be produced and that “denial” be processed if that proof of divorce isn't provided.
The final note on the INS page is that the divorce decree was produced. The SADO-BHO Sr. marriage was never in question or requested to be documented by INS in this 1965 INS inquiry.