>> Isn’t it a winning issue for the White House fundamentally, granted that the Politifact folks and the Washington Post pointed out that the President’s campaign ad on that issue had a lot, a lot of questions and a lot of questionable attack lines...
wait... what???
ROFL! Read that over three times for meaning, and see what YOU come up with.
No Rhodes scholar,this Andrea! I don’t care if she’s married to Alan Greenspan (who, as the years fly by, is looking less and less like a Rhodes scholar himself...)
See, that is the same vain as it is for saying it is not whether there was a crime committed, it is the seriousness of the charge that we need to look into (as long as it involves a GOP person).