Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Shethink13
You are confusing the "individual mandate" with the "Affordable Health Care Act".
Um...I don't think so.
Public Law 111–148 An Act Entitled The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.SEC. 1501. REQUIREMENT TO MAINTAIN MINIMUM ESSENTIAL COVERAGE.
(a) FINDINGS.—Congress makes the following findings:
(1) IN GENERAL.— The individual responsibility requirement provided for in this section (in this subsection referred to as the ‘‘requirement’’) is commercial and economic in nature, and substantially affects interstate commerce, as a result of the effects described in paragraph (2).

That is the law in question and that is the individual mandate, isn't it?
25 posted on 07/09/2012 10:57:05 PM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: Shethink13
Whaaaat?
I prove to be too informed so I get the silent treatment?
26 posted on 07/09/2012 11:11:49 PM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: Shethink13

Still waiting for you at reply 25.


39 posted on 07/10/2012 7:06:09 AM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson