To: taxcontrol
"I would rather have a constitutional amendment that specifically states that all treaties are subject to the Constitution. Precedent is far to easily overturned by activist judges." No need to because the Constitution is not subject to subordination to the UN or any other nation regardless of the whims of the UN, Zero, or Hillary. They cannot circumvent the Bill of Rights even though they imply they can. I'll stand by that statement.
13 posted on
07/09/2012 12:42:14 PM PDT by
Old Badger
(Don't bother me! I still like Palin because she will tell like it is! (Newt too!))
To: All
14 posted on
07/09/2012 12:45:59 PM PDT by
musicman
(Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
To: Old Badger
the Constitution is not subject to subordination to the UN or any other nation regardless of the whims of the UN, Zero, or Hillary. They cannot circumvent the Bill of Rights even though they imply they can. I'll stand by that statement. I'm with you -this is huffing and puffing on the part of mean spirited, but stupid - liberals. They wish they could impose the international crap on us - but they can't...
19 posted on
07/09/2012 1:21:11 PM PDT by
GOPJ
(Speak truth to lies - to ignorance. Speak honesty to corruption . Stand-up to liberal elite liars..)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson