The article does not exlicitly declare that this white doctor accused of sexually molesting a black man (boy?) is a homosexual.
Why?
Because it goes without saying? If I correctly understood the article before my security monitor shut it down, the student was 21 when he sought treatment from the doctor for an STD.
At what point could we say a 21-year-old man who’s obviously sexually active ought to be able to tell a 50-year-old queen to buzz off? We either need to say all homosexual activity is intolerable, period, or allow that a consensual relationship is the responsibility of the parties involved.
The victimization wars are being waged here: gays v. blacks. In the media, the gays win, no questions asked.